Home
Catalogue
Contact us
Six Drug Screen test
(MAD,
MOR, THC, AMP, COC, BZD)
INTENDED USE
The OneStep
6-Drug Screen Test is a immuno-chromatographic assay for
rapid, qualitative detection of the following drugs and
their principal metabolites in urine at the specified
cut-off concentrations:
TEST ZONE
DRUG
CLASS
SENSITIVITY
1
Methadone
300 ng/ml
2
Opiates/Morphine
300 ng/ml
3
Marijuana/Tetrahydrocannabinol
50 ng/ml
4
Amphetamine
1000 ng/ml
5
Cocaine/Benzoylecgonine
300 ng/ml
6
Benzodiazepine
300 ng/ml
Note:
The test provides only preliminary data which should be
confirmed by other methods such as gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry (GC/MS). Clinical considerations and
professionl judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse
test result, particularly when preliminary positive results
are indicated.
summary and explanation of the test
The OneStep 6-Drug Screen
Test is an easy, fast, qualitative, visually read,
competitive binding immunoassay method for screening without
the need of instrumentation. The method employs unique
mixture of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to
selectively identify Methadone, Morphine, Marijuana,
Amphetamine, Cocaine, Benzodiazepines and their metabolites
in test samples with a high degree of sensitivity.
Drug abuse remains a
growing social and economical concern in many developed and
developing countries throughout the world. Cocaine,
marijuana, amphetamines, and morphine are the most
frequently abused illicit drugs, according to the U.S.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Benzodiazepines and opiates are also among a class of
heavily abused prescription drugs. The opiates detectable
by this test include illicit opiates as well as components
of common antidepressants, cough and anti-diarrheal
medications.
The sensitivity of the
OneStep 6-Drug Screen Test is set at 300 ng/ml for
Methadone, 300 ng/ml for Morphine, 50 ng/ml for Marijuana,
1000 ng/ml for Amphetamine, 300 ng/ml for Cocaine, and 300
ng/ml for Benzodiazepines.
principle of the test
The OneStep
6-Drug Screen Test is a competitive binding immunoassay in
which drug and drug metabolites in a urine sample compete
with chemically labeled drug compounds for limited antibody
binding sites. By utilizing antibodies that are specific to
different drug classes, the test permits independent,
simultaneous detection of six drugs from a single sample.
The approximate run time is 10 minutes.
In the assay
procedure, urine mixes with labeled antibody-dye conjugate
and migrates along a porous membrane. When the
concentration of a given drug is below the detection limit
of the test, unbound antibody-dye conjugate binds to antigen
conjugate immobilized on the membrane, producing a rose-pink
color band in the appropiate Test Zone (marked “1 - 6”) for
that drug. Conversely, when the drug level is at or above
the detection limit, free drug competes with the antigen
conjugate on the membrane by binding to antibody-dye
conjugate, forming an antigen-antibody complex, preventing
the development of a rose-pink color band.
Regardless of the drug
levels in the sample, a rose-pink color band is produced in
each Control Zone (marked “C”) by a parallel immunochemical
reaction. These bands serve as built-in quality control
measures by demonstrating antibody recognition and verifying
that the reagents are chemically active.

REAGENTS AND MATERIALS PROVIDED
1. Test
Devices. Contains dye-conjugated
antibody and
immobilized antigen in protein matrix with sodium azide.
2.
Transfer
Pipettes. Individually sealed in foil
pouch with
test device.
3.
Test Instructions.
Optional
4. Urine
Cups
5.
Negative
Control Contains 1 ml of buffered
protein
solution with sodium azide.
6.
Methadone Positive Control. Contains 1 ml of MAD
1000
ng/ml in a
buffered protein solution with sodium azide.
7.
Morphine Positive Control Contains 1 ml of MOR
1000
ng/ml in a
buffered protein solution with sodium azide.
8.
Marijuana (THC) Positive
Control Contains 1 ml of THC 150
ng/ml in a
buffered protein solution with sodium azide.
9. AMP
Positive Control Contains 1 ml of AMP 3000
ng/ml in a
buffered protein solution with sodium azide.
10.
COC Positive Control
Contains 1 ml of COC 1000
ng/ml in a
buffered protein solution with sodium azide.
11. BZD Positive
Control Contains 1 ml of BZD 1000
ng/ml in a buffered
protein solution with sodium azide.
MATERIALS REQUIRED BUT NOT PROVIDED
1. Clock or timer.
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONStc
"WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS"
1. For
in vitro diagnostic and professional use only.
2. Do
not use the test device beyond the expiration date.
3. Urine
specimens may be infectious; properly handle and dispose of
all used reaction devices in a biohazard container.
4.
Visually inspect the foil package to insure it is intact.
If the package is not intact, discard the device.
Test procedure
1. Bring
patient samples and kit components to room temperature (15 -
28 °C).
2.
Remove a Test Cassette from the foil pouch and place it on a
level surface. Discard the pouch and dessicant.
3.
Holding the transfer pipette vertically, add 6 drops of
urine to the sample well.
Note:
For optimal performance, allow each drop to be completely
absorbed before adding the next.
4. Wait
10 minutes and read the result.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
Important:
Two control lines are
necessary in order to validate test results. If a rose-pink
color band fails to appear in one or both Control Zones
("C"), discard the cassette and retest the sample using a
new device.
EXAMPLE
(Actual
test results may vary)

POSITIVE
INVALID
MAD, MOR, THC
NEGATIVE
AMP,
COC, BZD
Positive: A rose-pink
band is visible in each control zone. No color band
appearing in
the appropiate test zone indicates a positive result for the
corresponding drug of that specific test zone.
Negative:
A rose-pink band is
visible in each control zone and the appropiate test zone,
indicates that the concentration of the corresponding drug
in that specific test zone is below the detection limit of
the test.
Invalid:
If a color band is not
visible in either or both control zones, the test is
invalid. Another test should be run to re-evaluate the
specimen.
Note:
There is no meaning attributed to line color intensity or
width.
Quality control
An internal
procedure control has been incorporated into the test to
ensure proper kit performance and reliability.
The use of an external
control is recommended to verify proper kit performance.
Quality control samples should be tested according to
quality control requirements established by the testing
laboratory.
Limitations of the test
1. This
product is designed to be used for the detection of
methadone, opiates, marijuana, amphetamine, cocaine and
benzodiazepines in human urine only.
2.
Although the test is very accurate, there is the possibility
false results will occur due to the presence of interfering
substances in the specimen sample.
3. The
test is a qualitative screening assay and is not
suggested for the quantitative determination of drug levels
in urine, or the level of intoxication.
4.
Adulterants such as bleach or
other strong oxidizing agents, when added to urine
specimens, can cause erroneous test results regardless of
the analysis method used. If adulteration is suspected,
obtain another urine specimen.
Performance characteristics
1.
Sensitivity. The OneStep 6-Drug Screen Test detects
methadone, morphine, marijuana, amphetamine, cocaine,
benzodiazepine and their major metabolites in urine at
concentrations equal to or greater than 300 ng/ml for
methadone, opiate, cocaine, and benzodiazepine, 1000 ng/ml
for amphetamine, and 50 ng/ml for marijuana.
2.
Specificity. A study was conducted with the OneStep
6-Drug Screen Test to determine the cross-reactivity of
drug-related compounds with the test. Substances listed in
Table I produced results approximately equivalent to
the cutoff levels. A separate study was conducted to
determine the cross-reactivity of non-related compounds with
the test at concentrations much higher than normally found
in the urine of people using or abusing them. No cross
reactivity was detected with the substances listed in
Table II.
Table I:
Concentrations of drug-related compounds showing positive
response approximately equivalent to the cut-off set for the
test:
The following
Methadone-related substances yield positive results for
Methadone:
|
Methadone
300 ng/ml
Doxylamine 10,000
ng/ml
Laam
10,000 ng/ml
n-methyldiethanolamine 50,000
ng/ml
Pentazocaine 50,000
ng/ml
Tetrahydrozoline 50,000
ng/ml |
The following
Morphine-related substances yield a positive result for
Morphine:
|
Morphine-3-b-D-Glucuronide 300 ng/ml
Codeine
300 ng/ml
Norcodeine 2,000
ng/ml
Nalorphine
300 ng/ml
Hydrocodone 500
ng/ml
Hydromorphone
300 ng/ml
Oxycodone 1,000
ng/ml
Levorphanol 600
ng/ml |
Naloxone 5,000 ng/ml
Thebaine 1,500 ng/ml
Naltrexone 5,000 ng/ml
Imipramine 50,000 ng/ml
Atropine 100,000 ng/ml
Meperidine 100,000 ng/ml
Ranitidine 100,000 ng/ml |
The following
Marijuana-related substances yield positive results for
Marijuana:
|
11-Nor-D
-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol
50 ng/ml
11-Nor-D
-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
500 ng/ml
D
-9-
Tetrahydrocannabinol
20,000 ng/ml
Cannabinol
50,000 ng/ml
Diflunisal
100,000 ng/ml |
The
following Amphetamine-related substances yield positive
results for
Amphetamine:
|
d-Amphetamine 1000 ng/ml
l-Amphetamine 25,000 ng/ml
d,l-Amphetamine 1000 ng/ml(+)Phenylpropanolamine
50,000 ng/ml
B
-Phenythylamine 90,000 ng/ml |
Thyramine 100,000
ng/ml
(+)3,4-Methylenedio
xyamphetamine(MDA) 1,000 ng/ml
Psuedoephedrine 100,000 ng/ml
Ephedrine 250,000
ng/ml |
The following
Cocaine-related substances yield positive results for
Cocaine:
|
Benzoylecgonine 300ng/ml
Cocaine
300 ng/ml
Isoxsurpine
1,500 ng/ml |
The
following Benzodiazepine-related substances yield positive
results for Benzodiazepine:
|
Alprazolam 62.5 ng/ml
Bromazepam 250 ng/ml
Clobazam 2,500 ng/ml
Chlordiazepoxide 2,500 ng/ml
Clorazepate 50 ng/ml
Clonazepam 500 ng/ml
Diazepam 50 ng/ml
Desmethyldiazepam 50 ng/ml
Flunitrazepam 250 ng/ml |
Flurazepam 100 ng/ml
Lorazepam 250 ng/ml
Lormetazepam
250 ng/ml
Medazepam 1,000 ng/ml
Nitrazepam 250 ng/ml
Oxazepam 250 ng/ml
Prazepam 100 ng/ml
Temazepam 100 ng/ml
Triazolam 100 ng/ml |
Table II: Compounds
tested and found not to cross-react with the test
|
N-Acetylprocainamide 200
mg/ml
Acetylsalicylic
acid 300
mg/ml
Amitryptyline 100
mg/ml
Amobarbital 100
mg/ml
Amoxicillin 130
mg/ml
l-Amphetamine
100
mg/ml
Apomorphine 100
mg/ml
ASP-PHE Methyl
Ester 100
mg/ml
Benzilic
Acid 300
mg/ml
Benzoic
Acid 280
mg/ml
Benzphetamine
100
mg/ml
Chlorothiazide 320
mg/ml
Chlorpromazine
100
mg/ml
Cholesterol 160
mg/ml
Clomipramine 230
mg/ml
Clonidine 100
mg/ml
Cortisone 120
mg/ml
(-)
Cotinine 100
mg/ml
Creatinine 190
mg/ml
Deoxycorticosterone 170
mg/ml
Ibuprofen 100
mg/ml
(-)
Isoproteronol 120
mg/ml
Iproniazid 120
mg/ml
Isoxsuprine 130
mg/ml
Ketamine 130
mg/ml
Ketoprofen 140
mg/ml
Labetalol 100
mg/ml
Lidocaine 100
mg/ml
Loperamide 150
mg/ml
Niacinamide 170
mg/ml |
Difclofenac 100
mg/ml
Diflunisal
100
mg/ml
Digoxin
150
mg/ml
Diphenhydramine 200
mg/ml
-Dimethylamoantipyrine 100
mg/ml
(+)
Ephedrine 130
mg/ml
(+)
Ephedrine 160
mg/ml
d-y-Ephedrine 290
mg/ml
Emg/mlrythromycin
150
mg/ml
b-Estradiol
110
mg/ml
Estrone-3-sulfate 100
mg/ml
Ethyl-p-aminobenzoate 180
mg/ml
Gentisic
acid 200
mg/ml
Guaiacol
Glyceryl Ether Carbonate 226
mg/ml
Glucuronic
acid 200
mg/ml
5-Hydroxytryptamine 100
mg/ml
Hippuric
acid 200
mg/ml
Hydralazine 100
mg/ml
Hydrochlorothiazide 100
mg/ml
3-Hydroxytryamine 160mg/ml
Nifedipine
140
mg/ml
Maprotiline 140
mg/ml
Meprobamate 100
mg/ml
Methaqualone 100
mg/ml
(S)-6-methoxy-a-methyl-
2-naphthaleneacetic acid 250
mg/ml
Methylphenidate 100
mg/ml
Methyprylon 100
mg/ml
Nalidixic
acid 130
mg/ml |
3.
Accuracy: Approximately 55 positive specimens above the
cut-off concentration for each of the 6 specific drugs were
evaluated using the , gas chromatography/mass
spectrophotometry (GC/MS), and a commercially available
enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for drug abuse. More than 100
drug-free specimens were also evaluated. The results are
presented in Table III below.
Table
III:
Drug/MetabolitE
|
Syva EMIT EIA II
|
GC/MS
|
Strip
|
|
(+/-)
|
(+/-)
|
(+/-)
|
MAD (Methadone)
|
|
|
|
> 300 ng/m
|
53/0
|
53/0
|
53/0
|
< 300 ng/ml
|
1/102
|
1/103
|
2/101
|
MOR (Morphine)
|
|
|
|
> 300 ng/ml
|
56/0
|
54/2
|
56/0
|
< 300 ng/ml
|
2/103
|
1/105
|
1/104
|
THC
(Marijuana/TetrahydRocannabinol)
|
|
> 50 ng/ml
|
63/0
|
63/0
|
63/0
|
< 50 ng/ml
|
1/142
|
0/142
|
0/142
|
AMP (Amphetamine)
|
|
|
|
> 1000 ng/ml
|
49/0
|
48/1
|
49/0
|
< 1000 ng/ml
|
1/110
|
2/109
|
0/111
|
COC
(Cocaine/Benzoylecgonine)
|
|
|
> 300 ng/ml
|
53/0
|
52/1
|
53/0
|
< 300 ng/ml
|
1/108
|
1/109
|
1/108
|
BZD
(Benzodiazepine)
|
|
|
> 300 ng/ml
|
58/4
|
60/2
|
62/0
|
< 300 ng/ml
|
5/116
|
2/119
|
3/118
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Methadone Test
1.
Urine Testing for Drugs of Abuse, National Institute on Drug
Abuse (NIDA), Research Monograph 73 (1986).
2.
B.J. Rounsaville, M.M. Weissman, P.H. Rosenberger, et. al.
"Diagnosis and Symtoms of Depression in Opiate Addicts:
Course and Relationship to Treatment Outcome," Arch. Gen.
Psychiatry 39 (1982): 151-56.
3.
B.J. rounsaville and H.D. Kleber, "Psychiatric Disorders and
the Course of Diagnostic Stability," in S.M. Mirin, ed.,
Substance Abuse and Psychopathology (American Psychiatric
Press: Washington, D.C., 1984): 134-51.
4.
C.A. Dackis and M.S. Gold. "Depression in Opiate Addicts,"
ibid, pp. 20-40.
5.
J.B. Wyngarrden, LH Jr., eds., Cecil Textbook of Medicine
(WB Saunders Co.: Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 57 and 60.
6.
M.J. Ellenhorn and D.G. Barceloux. Medical Toxicology
(Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., NY, 1988), pp.
714-18.
7.
D.S. Woolf. "Opioids," in N. Bennett, C. Vourakis and D.S.
Woolf, eds., (John Wiley & Sons: NY, 1983) pp. 70-85.
8.
F.E. Hofmann. A Handbook on Drug and Alcohol Abuse: The
Biomedical Aspects (Oxford University Press: NY, 1983).
9.
R.C. Baselt and R.H. Cravey,
Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, ed.3 (Year
Book Medical Publishers Inc.: Chicage, IL 1989), pp.
379-83.
Opiate
Test
1.
Huang, W., Andollo, W., Hearn W.L.J. Anal. Toxicol., 16:
307-310 (1992).
2.
Cone, E.J., Dickerson, S., Paul, B.D., Mitchell, J.M., J.
Anal. Toxicol., 17: 156-164 (1993).
3.
Glare, P.A., Walsh, T.D., and Pippenger, C.E., Ther. Drug
Monit., 13: 226-232 (1991).
4.
Walsh, T.D., Cheater, F.M., Pharm. J., 10: 525-527 (1983).
5.
Mitchell, J.M., Paul, B.D., Welch, P., Cone, E.J. J. Anal.
Toxicol., 15: 49-53 (1991).
6.
Department of Health and Human Services, Fed. Regist.,
53(69): 11970-11989 (1988), (1989).
Marijuana
Test
1.
Johansson, E., Gillespie, H.K., Halldin, M.M. J. Anal.
Toxicol., 14: 176-180 (1990).
2.
El Sohly, M.A., Jones, A.B., El Sohly, H.N. J. Anal.
Toxicol., 14: 277-279 (1990)14: 227-279 (1990).
3.
Foltz, R.L., Sunshine, I.J. Anal. Toxicol., 14: 375-378
(1990).
4.
Wimbish, G.H., Johnson, K.D. J. Anal. Toxicol., 14: 292-295
(1990).
5.
Nakamura, G.R., Meeks, R.D., Stall, W.J. J. Forensic Sci.,
35(4): 792-796 (1990).
6.
Jenkins, A.J., Mills, L.C., Darwin, W.D., Huestis, M.A.,
Cone, E.J., Mitchell, J.M. J. Anal. Toxicol., 17: 292-298
(1993).
7.
Hollister, L.E., Kanter, S.L., Board, R.D., Green D.E. Res.
Com. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol., 8: 579-584 (1974).
8.
Ferderal Register 53: 11970-11983 (1988).
Amphetamine Test
1.
Ellerbe, P., Long, T.,Welch, M.J., J. Anal. Toxicol., 17:
165-170 (1993).
2.
Cody, J.T., Schwarzhoff, R., J. Anal. Toxicol., 17: 23-33
(1993).
3.
Urine Testing for Drugs of Abuse, NIDA Research Monograph
73, (1986).
4.
Dasguspta, A., Saldana, S., Kinnaman, G., Smith M.,
Johansen, K., Clin. Chem., 39: 104-108 (1993).
5.
Department of Health and Human Services, Fed. Regist.,
53(69): 11970-89 (1988).
Cocaine
Test
1.
D.W. Hoyt et al. J. Am. Med. Assoc., Vol. 258 (1987), pp.
504-509.
2.
R.R. MacGregor, J.S. Fowler, and A.P. Wolf. J. of
Chromatography, Vol. 590 (1992), pp. 354-58.
3.
E.J. Cone, D. Yousefnejad, and S.L. Dickerson. J. of
Forensic Sciences, Vol. 35, No.4 (1990), pp. 786-91.
4.
E.J. Cone et al. J. of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 1
(1989), pp. 15-31.
5.
B. Holmstedt and A. Fredga. J. of Ethnopharmacology, Vol. 3
(1981), pp. 113-47.
6.
T. Inaba and J. Can. Physiol. Pharmacol., Vol. 67 (1989),
pp. 1154-57
7.
A.R. Jeffcoat et al. Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Vol.
17, No. 2 (1989), pp. 153-59.
8.
R.C. Baselt and R. Chang. J. Anal. Toxicol., Vol. 11 (1987),
pp. 81-82.
9.
Federal Register, Vol. 53, No. 69 (1988), pp. 11970-89.
Benzodiazepine Test
1.
S.J., Mule and G.A. Gasella. "Quantitation and Confirmation
of the Diazolo and Ttazolobenzodiazepines in Human Urine by
GC/MS," J. Anal. Toxicol., Vol. 13 (1989), pp. 179-184.
2.
C. Drouet-Coassolo, C. Aubert, P. Coassolo, and J. Cano.
"Capillary GC/MS Method for the Identification and
qualification of some Benzodiazepines and Their Unconjugated
Metabolites in Plasma," J. Chromatogr., Vol. 487 (1989), pp.
295-311.
3.
C. Ballanto, V. Reggi, G. Tognoni, et al. "Benzodiazepines:
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Use, " Drugs, Vol. 19
(1980): 195-219.
4.
A.J. Giannini and E.A. Slaby. Drugs of Abuse (MEDEC Books:
1989), Ch. 4, pp. 59-80.
5.
M.A. Pear and L. Kopjak, "The Screening and Quantitation of
Diazepam, Flurazepam, Chlordiazepoxide, and Their
Metabolites in Blood and Plasma by Electron-Capture Gas
Chromatography and High Pressure Liquid Chromatography," J.
Forensic Sci., Vol. 24 (1979), pp. 46-54.
6.
H. Schultz, "Modern Screening Strategies in Analytical
Toxicology with Special Regard to New Benzodiazepines," J.
Legal. Med., Vol. 100 (1988) pp. 19-37.
7.
J.G. Langner, B.K. Gan, R.H. Liu, L.D. Baugh, P. Chand, J.L.
Weng, et. al. "Enzymatic Digestion, Solid-Phase Extraction,
and GC/MS of Derivatized Intact Oxazepam in Urine," Clin.
Chem., Vol. 37 (1991) pp.1596-1601.
8.
R.L. Fitzgerald, D.A. Rexin, and D.A. Herold.
"Benzodiazepine Analysis by Negative Chemical Ionization
GC/MS," J. Anal. Toxicol., Vol. 17, pp. 342-347.